Karen Foley
Lynn Raye Harris
Ellen Hartman
Diana Holquist
Samantha Hunter
Shirley Jump
Dee Tenorio
Jeannie Watt
Welcome Guest Blogger Natale Stenzel!
The Druid Made Me Do It
I never really set out to write these stories as a series. One funny paranormal romance -- I would have thought -- would be enough weirdness for the market to stand from one weird author named Natale Stenzel. But then . . .
Okay, we’ll start at the beginning. First there was Pandora’s Box. That was the secret pleasure I wrote in the belief that New York would never buy it, so I wrote it exactly the way I wanted it. ‘Exactly the way I wanted it,’ however, just happened to include an ending that begged for another story based on my secondary characters. That was kind of risky, right? I’d leave readers hanging if book number two never came out to satisfy questions. But that didn’t matter to me. As I said, I’d written this story to please myself. Ah, but then the unexpected happened and I sold it. Even more unexpectedly, my new editor let me keep that ending. And so we birthed The Druid Made Me Do It. (And by the way, as a reward for toughing it out through this blog post, I’ll be giving away to a commenter one free copy of Pandora’s Box, the story that started this whole mess in the first place. You know, the prequel.)
So, writing a series. What on earth was I thinking? Well . . . mostly that I really, really loved the world that I’d created and that I’d left a couple of amusing but secondary characters in a position that needed some explaining, developing and resolving. Talk about a challenge. Before I go any further, how about some blurbs, just so you know where all of this is originating:
The first book in my series of funny paranormal romances, Pandora’s Box (Dorchester Love Spell, February 2008), tells the story of Pandemina Dorothy Avery, a woman in dire financial straits who inherits . . . a rock. But not just any rock; no, her legacy turns out to be a fragment from a monolith that once stood in the stone circle at Avebury. Yes, just like Stonehenge, except the Circle of Avebury is bigger, older and less well-preserved. Of course, my heroine doesn’t realize the significance of this rock at first, any more than she knows about an ancient curse, a condemned but gorgeous trickster of a puca named Riordan, or how much her strange inheritance would disrupt her life.
My August 2008 release, The Druid Made Me Do It (check out that hunky cover!), picks up where Pandora’s Box leaves off, with some of the same cast and mythologies, but with a new romantic couple and new conflict. To satisfy karma and Druid justice, hunky but penitent bad boy Kane must make amends to everyone he’s harmed in the past – including Dr. Janelle Corrington, his new and reluctant guardian. How does a Druid convince a human doctor to take on guardianship of the guy who devastated her years ago? Why, he offers compensation in the form of a gift she cannot refuse: the power to heal with just a touch. Not that this gift is without its own drawbacks . . . and temptations.
And speaking of drawbacks and temptations, I swear I was seduced into writing this series by the characters themselves. They just grew so large in my mind that I couldn’t let them go, couldn’t leave them where they were. It’s so satisfying, really. Even the secondary characters, the ones that go from book to book with me, have arcs of their own, with back story to reveal, motivations to outline and fulfill, and lessons to learn. Oberon, king of the faeries, is suave, less than faithful, but full of strong if flawed love for his family and a responsibility toward his people. His wife, Titania . . . oh, do I have fun with her. At first, she seems merely frivolous and poisonous – definitely some comic relief with this character – but over the course of a few books, we begin to understand why she is the way she is.
Did I know this starting out? Heck, no. If I did, I might have talked myself out of a project as complex as this. Not just book arcs but entire series arcs. Oh, and then there’s High Druid Phil. (Yes, I said ‘Phil.’) He’s a modern professional with thinning hair, designer specs, purple sneakers and a disarmingly sunny disposition. I fell in love with him and was so thrilled to hear my editor and some of my readers did, too. So – yay! – I had a blast with him in my third book, which I just finished. Originally, I’ll admit, I envisioned Phil as more of a minor, walk-on character. But then, as I kept writing from one scene to the next, one book to the next, he grew unexpected depths. Scary funny. I’m not kidding. I love Phil.
So, as you can see, I’ve grown obsessed with this world I created. I’m having a lot of fun playing in my own backyard for a while longer. There’s so much to discover now that I have the opportunity to dig deeper. But still . . . there are pitfalls and drawbacks when you use the same world and some of the same characters for separate books. For example, you have to be careful with words like ‘always’ and ‘never,’ especially when you’re writing paranormals. Once you lay down a law and a book goes to print, you have to follow that law for subsequent books. I like to leave a little loophole in case I need it later – since, after all, I didn’t plot this series when I first started writing it. I need a little wiggle room so I don’t get stuck later.
Another negative: keeping everything straight. Seriously. Hair color, last names, timelines. This would be so much easier if I were a plotter and had everything graphed and diagrammed and organized into little tabbed sections and charts. I don’t. I have free-flowing blather. Sophisticated, huh? But that’s my process. I’ve tried to fight it, tried to incorporate all the little organizational toys (I love office supplies as much as the next girl), but they just pile up in between the story and me until I can’t see past the charts and graphs well enough to recognize the spark that lit up the story for me in the first place. So I do this the messy way and clean up during revision and editing. Will I make mistakes? Very likely. But my characters will be three-dimensional and totally alive for me and – I hope – the reader. That’s the trade-off.
So, have I learned my lesson about writing books in a series? No, not so far. I think I mentioned I just finished writing the third book in the series. It’s called Between a Rock and a Heart Place, due out in March 2009, and yes, we’re talking about another couple with a new romantic conflict and . . . yeah, okay, you’ll guess the premise for this book as soon as you read the ending for Druid. I couldn’t help myself.
Thanks for having me on Cigars, Sam! I had such a good time guest blogging here when Pandora came out that I couldn’t resist coming back. So, as I mentioned, I’m giving away a copy of Pandora’s Box, the first book in this series, to a randomly drawn commenter on this blog. Just leave me a note telling me if you like to read or write books in a series. What do you like or dislike? Do you have a favorite or a couple of favorites that you follow? What’s the appeal? You do have to be registered at Cigars to be eligible to win.

Welcome Natale!
Love having you here again! Your cover and title are wonderful -- I'm so happy this series has taken hold for you!
I love reading and writing series! I am more of a mystery and urban fantasy reader for that reason, though I have read some paranormal romance series (and yours is on the TBR.) :) I always loved all of Nora's old series, and some of her trilogies.
I enjoy single character series the most because I like the focus on a protagonist over time, seeing them grow and change and also how their world changes. For me it's Jim Butcher's Harry Desden, Charlaine Harris's series (all of them, though I'm wearing thin on Sookie, but looking forward to the HBO series), and Patricia Briggs, Sue Grafton, and JD Robb (though again, recent JD Robb was disappointing, IMO). I also enjoy Monk, Veronica Mars, and Buffy. I love being in the world with a character for a sustained time, though the danger in that is that eventually that character has to grow in real ways as the world around them changes, and the stories have to stay fresh. Sometimes you can see where an author should have take a character or a storyline, and when they veer off somewhere else, it can be disappointing.
The only series I've been able to write so far was my HotWires series for Blaze, and I enjoyed it immensely. Since then, I've taken part in mini-series with other authors but haven't written a series of my own, though I am sending my mystery series proposal to my agent today sp she can start shopping it, so I go between that "Yahoo!" and "What was I thinking?" feeling too, and I hope I'm up to the challenge. :)
Until then I'll just enjoy reading all the series you all are putting out there. :)
Sam
Thanks, Sam!
Thanks again for having me here today:) -- and thanks for the warm welcome! I love Nora's trilogies. They're all over my keeper shelf. I think, for me, I want a separate romance in each book but love having them related. It's the die-hard romance fan in me, I guess. I just want more closure than a single-character series could give me. And, even if you do have a romance in the single-character series, you risk that whole Moonlighting problem. Remember that show? As soon as Cybil Shepherd and Bruce Willis got together, the show imploded:(. I was so sad.
Congrats and fingers crossed on your mystery series. Might I recommend the bliss of denial? I find it really works for me. Pretend it's not out there and keep writing. Otherwise, it's so easy to obsess, you know?
OMG
LOL, I do remember Moonlighting -- we're dating ourselves. ;)
Although the new solution to that old problem is more than a romance between one couple -- that does dead end -- so in most of these books you see several possible relationships, relationships that stop and start, people that die, new lovers, etc, as the heroine's life changes...it's really her story, I guess (or his, in the case of Monk or Harry Dresden). I think I like them for that reason, the kind of ongoing complexity, but also, there's usually someone you know the heroine will end up with, in the end -- or at least the person that is the real "hero." I think the Stephanie Plum books started that trend, with Joe and Ranger, but even that dead-ended, since when she doesn't make a choice, she just ends up ping-ponging back and forth. The whole situation has to be made much more complex to hold up over books.
I'm into the bliss of denial LOL.
Sam
Sssshhhh!
What, you don't think I was around when that series *first* came on, do you??? LOL Reruns. Hearsay. I probably don't even know what I'm talking about.
Seriously, when you describe it that way, I can only see the stakes getting higher for the author. That character had better be darn compelling. And the choices, the consequences . . . wow. But when it works, I bet the payoff is unimaginable.
um, okay...
Now when YOU describe it that way, how am I supposed to get into the bliss of denial???? LOL
Oh well, I'll have to trust the universe. ;)
Oh, and yeah, I meant I knew Moonlighting from the DVDs... that's right. Netflix... ;)
Sam
Oops:)
Sorry, Sam*g*. Denialdenialdenial. And failing that, imagine lovely payoff:).
I love reading series. I
I love reading series. I can read more about my fave characters and I'm introduced to new ones too. I do have some favorites. Lora Leigh's Breed series and her Navy Seals series, Delilah Devlin's Dark Realms series, Sydney Croft's Storm books, and Jaci Burton's Demon Hunters.
Will have to try those!
Hi, Amy! I admit I haven't read those but have them recommended to me over and over again. Let me put a dent in my TBR mountain (it can happen -- vacation coming up) and I'll start building it up again*g*. I love TBR piles; so comforting to know there are so many in line, waiting to be read . . .
Seriously Sexy Cover!!
MMMmmmm.
Oh, wait, was I supposed to add something meaninful here? Dang.
Ahem. Series vs singles. Well, the truth is there is room for both. Some single books are so well done, including wrapping things up nicely for the secondary characters (Sam's About Last Night did this so well) that a single book can convey all you need or want.
But there is something fun about series if they don't drag on and on. As long as they keep bringing something new to the table and its not the same story rehashed time and again (not naming names in case they blog here) and there's a continuing plot (ditto!) then I love series. Its fun to see old characters pop up and catch up with them again. As well, as meeting new characters.
What can I say? If it's well written, I'm easy! ;-)
ani
LOL
Hi, Ani!
You should have seen my first view of the cover. It was electronic and very, very large. Basically, I opened to a full screen of man's navel*eg*. (Fans self.) Glad you like the cover!
Series vs. singles . . . I don't think I'd ever compare the two or consider them competing formats. I think series just builds on singles but sometimes all you really want is that one happy, completely satisfying story, sigh. Total closure and you contentedly put the world to bed, you know? I think it's when the world around that story is so intriguing -- especially with a paranormal, where the world is unfamiliar -- that you want to see more. And, frankly*g*, sometimes the author just has a hard time letting go of that world and hopes the readers are equally enchanted.
As a reader, I want both (more, more, more -- so greedy*g*).
Hi!!
Hi, Natale! I love a series! I love going back or staying with a place/characters that I've gotten to know--I also think it's fun to see the same places/people/events from a slightly different point of view. I don't like a series to go on to the point where it feels stale, but if each story is still fresh, I'm happy for a series to continue indefinitely! As for favorites, I loved Julia Quinn's Bridgertons, Suz Brockmann's TDD, Alison Kent's SG-5, and Sylvia Day's Georgian series. I'm also enjoying Sarah McCarty's Promises...
Hi backatcha, Fedora*g*
Good point! Dragging a series out too long is definitely a problem. Instead of that good feeling, wanting more, you leave a reader a little jaded. A risk you run, I guess. Another risk: leaving the series open-ended because the publisher doesn't buy that final book that gives everyone total closure. I would hate that as a writer and a reader. Maybe that's part of the reason why so many trilogies sell -- a happy medium.
That would be HORRIBLE!!!
I live for closure, so I would HATE to have a series without a final book! Aack!!! Sometimes I actually hold off on starting a series until I have the entire set in my hands... Sad, huh? And it's true, a trilogy is often a nice number, but sometimes I like a series a bit longer, too--it gives the author a chance to really explore a world and the characters' relationships better... Oh, the balancing act!
SERIES
I like reading books in a series as long as there is not so much time between the individual books coming out that I have to go find the previous book and reread it.
The appeal to series book is just what you mentioned--I like to know what happens to the minor characters in a book. Of course this is true only if that character is interesting and not just part of the background.
I am loving the "Homecoming *Heroes*" series from Love Inspired. I also very much enjoyed the "Wilder Family" continuity from SSE by various authors. And the "Tulanes of Tennesse" by Kay Stockham.
Hi, Ellen:)
I know what you mean about not wanting to wait too long between books in a series -- and I'm guessing that's why Fedora likes to hold off reading until she has the entire series in hand:) -- but how long is too long? A year? Six months? More? less? Thanks for the input:).
LOL
You know I think a book a year is a good rate -- see above blog on slowing down, LOL. Most of my favorite non-romance series authors do have books out once a year, with some exceptions like Richelle Mead, who is scary prolific. Typically I'm okay with waiting a year for a book.
Sam
wait between books
That's very patient of you, Sam*g*. And I did enjoy your post -- you make some great points and I felt downright wistful as I was reading it.
I think, as a writer and a reader I'm not so patient, though:(. I wouldn't take that year to wallow around in my story and make it beautiful. I'd take it to blog hop and do e-mail and play solitaire . . . and wait until the very end to plow through my story. I thrive on deadline pressure. I find two books per year to be working for me right now -- it allows both recovery time and deadline pressure.
I also wonder . . . romance readers in general seem to expect quicker delivery than readers of other genres.
Six months
More than that and I've forgotten too much. And with Mt TBR the way it is, I don't always have time to go back for a reread (or, as Sam has pointed out, I don't take the time).
But...it also depends on the series. Susan Elizabeth Phillips wrote a great series (her Chicago Stars books) and they were released about a year apart. It was the kind of series were you didn't have to reread because they weren't that involved.
But paranormal series where you're trying to remember whose a faery, a witch, which one turns invisible, which one blows up, then a year is too long in between.
Just my opinion, of course!
ani
ani
There's also Briggs and Harris, whom you pointed me to -- they are probably about one book a year?
Natale, I play Tetris in the evenings sometimes, and I do email, etc all day while I'm writing, as you can see... LOL
Sam
E-mail? Games?
Nooooo! You don't say*g*.
waiting and exceptions
Well, yeah, but that's Susan Elizabeth Phillips, too*g*. You might forget her characters or whatever, but you don't forget her and you probably buy all of her books on name recognition alone. If you read a book by a relatively new/unknown author, and then have to wait too long for the next book . . . you don't just forget the characters; you might also forget the author? And so she must start over . . .
Wait between books
A single author series - I really don't have an answer because it depends on how closely related the stories are. If they are closely interconnected three months at the most.
A multiauthor series - one a month would be ideal.
Maybe I expect too much from authors.
I Heart Series
Hi Natalie,
I love reading series. It gives us a chance to reconnect and catch up with past characters. Some of my favorites include Colleen Gleason's Gardella Vampire Chronicles, Stephanie Laurens' Cynster and Bastion Club series, Nora Robert's Sign of Seven Trilogy and Nicole Jordan's Paradise series.
Hi, Jane:)
Ah. I'm sensing another paranormal fan here . . .:). I'm dying for the last Sign of Seven book to come out -- not till December, I think:(. God only knows how that woman can write a good book every time, but she does. My keeper shelf groans under the strain.
Sign of Seven
I haven't even started the first two yet because I want to read them all at the same time. Which is easy enough to do if it's a trilogy. If it's an ongoing series, though, whew. That makes it much more difficult to wait.
Sorry, don't mean to be clogging up the thread with my meanderings!
ani
You're not clogging:)
You're adding to discussion. Totally different thing -- and appreciated. I know a lot of people who wait to read until they have the whole series. I can't*g*. It's like putting chocolate in the cabinet and saying leave it untouched until X. Dream on*g*. No will power. Very sad.
Series Books
I love series books. It is so much fun to be able to revisit with characters from previous books and find out what has been happening with them. I am reading a series book right now. I am reading Turbulent Sea by Christine Feehan which is [part of her Drake Sister series.
Turbulent Sea
Yep, that one's near the top of mount TBR for me, too. Love Feehan.
Winner: Goddessani!!!!
Congrats to goddessani!!! My son helped me with the drawing this morning*g*. Just e-mail me at natale@natalestenzel.com to give me a snail mail address and I'll send you your copy of Pandora's Box!
Thanks, everyone, for participating! This was a lot of fun! And thanks for having me here on Cigars!!
Thanks Natale
I hope we can count on seeing you for the next installment in your series! :)
And congrats ani!
Sam
Count on it
. . . and thanks for your hospitality:).
Woo Hoo!!
Lucky me!! Email on it's way!!
Congrats! And thanks!
Hooray for Ani! And thank you again for visiting, Natale! Great discussion :)
Welcome, Natale!
It's such a pleasure to see you here on Cigars, Natale! I remember the first RWA conference where we met; you'd just been notified that you sold your first book and you were our beacon of hope that we, too, might someday wear that coveted First Sale ribbon!! Congratulations on what I am certain will be a long and successful writing career! I love your cover and title, btw.
I love series books. I loved Lisa Kleypas' Wallflower series and I've read all of Suzanne Brockmann's Troubleshooter series. I love meeting secondary characters who eventually get their own story. I have a book coming out in February that involves a Delta Force hero and his unit of teammates, and the copy-editor made a comment that the book would make a great series. I hadn't actually considered that as an option, but since she brought it up...hmmm.
Thank you so much for a great post!
Thanks, Karen:)
A beacon of hope, huh? Does that in any way resemble ditzy space cadet?*g* That conference was a lovely, lovely blur for me. I was too excited to sleep and, um, I think it showed*g*. Thanks for all the kind words -- I appreciate the boost today:).
Your Delta Force guy plus teammates would make a mouthwatering series, if you ask me*g*. And, hey, if your editor's in favor, I say go for it. A friendly word of warning, though*g*: Once you write a series, it's hard to stop thinking in those terms. Oh, sure, the book ideas keep coming; they just tend to arrive with potential friends in tow . . .
'Welcome Natale
It is nice to see you here again. I love reading books in a series. The main reason I love them is because sometime when I finish a book I want more. I want to know what happens with all the characters. So a lot of books leave me wanting more.