Karen Foley
Lynn Raye Harris
Ellen Hartman
Diana Holquist
Samantha Hunter
Shirley Jump
Dee Tenorio
Jeannie Watt
Welcome Guest Blogger Jennifer Lewis!
She’s not our sort, dear!
The blurb on the back cover of my new book Seduced for the Inheritance starts like this:
She was the cook's plain-Jane daughter.
He was the estate owner's privileged son.
I didn’t write the blurb, but I love the way these lines sum up a core aspect of the conflict: the difference in social status between the hero and the heroine.
This has always been one of my favorite romantic conflicts. Perhaps because I grew up in England, where so much of the nation’s literature revolves around the issue of even minute differences in social status. Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is a perfect example, with the fabulously wealthy Mr. Darcy deigning to show interest in the respectable-but-not-quite-one-of-us Elizabeth Bennett.
I think most of us have a strong sense of the innate foolishness of the idea that one person is more “special” than another because of the family or social class they were born into, and I think that seeing those notions overturned is one of the reading pleasures that makes Cinderella-style romances so popular.
I know I adore it when the wealthy hero—who’s been raised to believe that the sun shines out of…the family coffers—realizes the heroine is every bit as important as him, despite her humble origins, and that he just can’t live without her.
The heroine of Seduced for the Inheritance, Anna Marcus, is educated and independent and has started her own business. She knows she’s just as good as the hero. She also realizes that perhaps—due to his upbringing—he doesn’t feel the same way.
My personal observation of American society (and feel free to argue with me!) is that while middle class Americans often see America as a classless society, the ‘upper crust’ feel differently and are very conscious of their place—on the top. I’ve noticed that people who grow up going to exclusive private schools, associating only with people like themselves, and knowing that they are expected to be just as accomplished and wealthy as their peers and parents, assume a sense of privilege and entitlement that shapes everything they do.
My hero, Reynaldo De Leon, is no different. His family traces their ancestry back to the time of the conquistadors. His family’s distinguished past, and their vast estate of citrus groves, surround him like an ermine mantle and he’s never felt any need to question his natural place in life as Lord of All He Surveys.
When the heroine inherits part of All He Surveys and doesn’t share his conviction that it is still rightfully his, that’s when the sparks start to fly.
Naturally, Naldo has a bit of a growth arc to climb. I love watching an arrogant, alpha male gradually realize that his assumptions are not necessarily correct, and that his worldview could use some adjustments. Naturally this is not an easy journey for him ;-)
My favorite part of romances where the characters are from different social strata is, of course, the happy ending where the hero and heroine realize that their connection goes far deeper than trivial considerations of wealth and upbringing, and they live Happily Ever After.
Do you like romances where the social status of either character is part of the conflict? Or does it make you feel uncomfortable to be reminded that such snobbery can still exist? If you have any favorites, please share as I’m always looking for a good read!
I’ll choose someone who leaves a comment today (don't forget, you must be a registered user to qualify!) to win a copy of Seduced for the Inheritance. If you already have the book (a quality to be admired!) you will win a copy of my July book The Boss’s Demand. If you already own that too, then I dearly love you and I will give you something else J
Jen

Hmmm... Okay, I'll jump in!
First, welcome Jen! What a juicy blog topic, and a beautiful cover! Class is actually a huge issue for me, in life, if not directly in my writing.
I grew up in a very working-class environment in a very industrial town where everyone's parents once were farmers, and then factories took over farms, and so everyone's parents worked at factories...Hard work, dirty work. How hard you work becomes the basis of your identity, basically. For the upper class, it's just the other side of the coin -- how much you earn becomes the basis of your identity, but it's closely related.
I think you're right that people on the lower income brackets are more aware of class differences, however, I wouldn't say they are more fair in their perceptions of class. We grew up with strong class biases in that reverse direction, and a lot of anti-money bias as well -- people were automatically judged because of how much money they had -- the classic, "if you have money, you must be a jerk" or as if it was a miracle to find a genuine, nice person who was also wealthy.
That changed (thankfully) as we grew up to be the first in our families to go to college, to travel extensively, to move into professions that weren't industrial. For me, it was even more acute, since I became an academic and a writer, which is such an anomoly -- you know, how do you make money sitting home all day? My father still pokes at us about that. Those conceptions of work and value become part of who we are -- I was working from the time I was 13, babysitting, and always worked around the house before that -- it was a big adjustment, and still is sometimes, for me to deal with this new notion of "work" because how we value ourselves as people is tied to it.
As I got older, it became easier to see how our biases were wrong. People with money, status, were just people, and no better, no worse. Working class people I knew often offended me with their attitudes about others. They also tended to be much less liberal and more racially biased, as well. Even in the family unit, it's visible -- my parents were proud of us for doing well, but also I was keenly aware that I was bridging two worlds, and often, things like buying higher quality items, etc was looked at with that "oh, so you're a big shot now?" kind of attitude... There were times when I wouldn't tell my parents I had bought something, say, a new piece of furniture, or how much it cost -- and this was in my 30s. Working class attitudes tend to be more entrenched, I think, and very much a part of identity -- maybe more than or as much as upper class.
Also found status and wealth are not the same -- academics and writers may have status, but not a whole lotta money, LOL. ;) People were always shocked to find how little I made as a university instructor (and well, we won't talk about the writing income thing, huh? LOL)
I think the middle class is a slippery animal, because within it, you have people who are doing very well, but who are also, as we're seeing in the housing crises, living beyond their means. And in the middle class, on the lower end, people with families, two incomes, who are just making ends meet. If anything I see these people as keenly aware of class. It's difficult to even have an identity in the middle class.
I was a professor at a private university where the students came from much wealthier families than I did, and where they drove better cars at 18 than I did at 30. ;) The young people did have a sense of entitlement -- I'll admit that, and often acted as if their professors worked for them, owed them an A, etc, because their parents were paying for them to be there. However, they acted this way with everyone in life -- some of the professors were very famous, and they would act that way with them too, and needed to be reminded that their class status actually didn't follow them into the classroom ;>
On the other hand, I worked at a state university as well, where it was more working class students, most of whom held jobs, and who worked really hard for their grades, and expected to, because they understood the concept of "work."
So in that college atmosphere, I saw a more classic breakdown. However, I don't think it's ever as clean a break as we need to make it in books. Still, it does open up a world of conflict, and it's one of my favorites, too, though I haven't used it in books as much. It's classic Cinderella, right? Powerful archetypes...
I think you see it in paranormal a lot -- I'm reading my first Nalini Singh book now, and the conflicts between the races, changelings and Psys, etc are very reflective of class and race -- people often don't think about it, because it's so much a part of who we are, and all the baggage that comes with it...
Sam
Very interesting point about
Very interesting point about it being an issue in Paranormals. I wonder if that's a more comfortable realm for us to discuss these issues because it doesn't feel too sharp and immediate because they're not "one of us" (literally, LOL).
I do think that sense of entitlement that you noticed can be a self-fulfilling prophecy to a certain extent because if people expect to be successful, that's a big leg up to actually getting there. Hence the appeal of the alpha male who thinks the world is his oyster.
I do think that a lot of people who come from working class backgrounds do go on to pursue their own path (much as you did) and end up doing something completely different than what their parents/family expected or even wanted. That's one of the many things I love about the good old US-of-A. When I lived in the UK it was pretty unusual to make a massive leap of social class, but I imagine that's changed quite a bit. I've noticed though, in people who have made their own wealth in their lifetime, they often carry a bit of a chip on their shoulder and still feel like they don't quite fit in and are looked down upon by their neighbors who were born with silver sippy cups in their mouths. All of this stuff shapes how we see the world and our place in it. Pretty fascinating stuff.
http://www.jenlewis.com
"The young people did have a
"The young people did have a sense of entitlement"
This occurs in the High School population as well but there it is more the parents than the students. I ran across it many times when I had parent conferences.
So many thoughts tumbling around
Wow - I think your observations about American society are pretty spot on!
I don't mind romances where the social status is part of the conflict, if there is enough story to go along with it. I'm a sucker for a good story and can enjoy *almost* anything if the writing and the story are good!
mind reader?!?!?
It's funny, a friend of mine and I were just talking about this. I could care less about anybody's statis and just like people for who they are, but I know that not everybody is that way. I seriously don't judge somebody by their house, car, etc. and even feel alittle more comfortable if they aren't rich and/or a neat freak. lol I had a friend within the last couple of years who was really fun, but everything was about the money. She always made comments about those holiday blow ups in yards and called people white trash for it. While I don't have any in my yard usually(only because I haven't bought them), I did use two of my dads for Halloween in August at the campground and was proud to do it.HA!HA! I guess she would have died if she saw everbody with their decorated trailers in the middle of summer. Needless to say, I have grown away from her and try to associate with "real" people who aren't afraid to just be themselves. I can't stand when people act snobbish about money, possesions, and looks. What happened to just being nice and having fun?
ETA: See you have me wound up. lol I would never tell my son that somebody isn't our sort. I would just be thrilled if he finds somebody nice someday. I'd rather that, than someone of any statis that might treat him badly.
I wonder...
...if those of us that aren't in the "top" status are more likely to be accepting of everyone for who they are rather than how much they have?
well, at the risk of being smacked with tomatoes...
I don't think so. I know I went on and on about it, but in my experience, people with less money are often more aware of money issues, and may have just as many biases or be just as judgmental. I really think it's a myth that people with less are more open minded, and my experience seems to bear that out.
I think it comes down to people, and there are good and bad in every bunch...
Sam
Why tomatoes?
"I think it comes down to people, and there are good and bad in every bunch..."
Sam - Ultimately, I think you are exactly right with that comment. I've seen the good and bad on both ends.
well, let's say I'm pretty good at dodging vegetables... ;)
especially when I play devil's advocate... ;)
S
Can you dodge fruit, too?
LOL - touche'!
Exactly...
Agree with what you said about your son. I think how people are is more important that what they have or don't...
I think it would be fun to find books that flip the dynamic -- and I know I've read them (probably Nora's) where the poor person is the judgemental one with the chip on their shoulder, and the wealthy person is not really concerned about their status... I think that can make a good story, too...
I should probably pipe down, LOL -- but this is a topic I really find interesting...
Sam
I actually think that is the
I actually think that is the realistic scenario! IMHO most rich, successful people don't really think about poor people at all--they're just not on their radar--so they're not judgmental or hostile because they're just not interested. It's the poor people who probably look at the obnoxious rich people riding roughshod over them and gnash their teeth about it.
I'd say this scenario is similar to the setup in my book!
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
I agree
I think that would be fun in a book too. Although, get over it already and just be friends with the person or get into a relationship. If they like you, they like you...DEAL WITH IT!! lol
I have to agree that kind of
I have to agree that kind of snobbery lights my hair on fire! I honestly know that I'm just not on the same wavelength as someone if they judge and label another person. It's usually insecurity behind it, IMHO.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
ROFL
Lights your hair on fire. Never heard that before, but think I will steal it. lol
Hair on Fire
I think that was a Snarkism (ie a phrase enjoyed by Miss Snark on her agent blog). Since I already stole it go ahead and steal it back :grin:
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Classes
I totally agree with you... America is totally separated in classes... it is a bit less like this in Canada where we believe more that education is accessible to everyone, so calsses are less apparent, though still exist if you go walk in the upper-crust part of town or go to the lavish shops!
PS: I have both your books... and I have still not read Seduced for the Inheritance!
I adore you for having both
I adore you for having both of my books :-)
America seems very classless after the UK, where people class seemed to be a much bigger deal and on people's minds all the time. I remember watching an interview with Michael Caine on TV in the UK where the interviewer was obsessing over his working class origins, and I was like GET OVER IT--he's been a mega successful and rich actor for decades now! People in the US tend to have more of a chance to remake themselves without constantly being reminded of where they came from.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Interesting...
I don't know that you ever get over it -- it's not so much something to get over as much as a part of who you are, how you see the world -- and that's not a bad thing.
I think it comes down to understanding how it shapes you, but not treating it like a liability -- though it can be if you have a chip or an inferiority complex of some sort. Personally, I've always seen it as an advantage, as it shaped a strong work ethic that has helped me accomplish a lot. It's also taught me I can enjoy material success, and I can also live well without it, make a meal on what's available, stretch when we have to, etc. These are good things.
Where it can get in the way is if you define yourself too much by work -- I get very edgy if I don't have defined work and income. To me, working and earning is very much a part of how I see my (and others') value in the world. That can be a double-edged sword.
Okay, I'm being such a chatterbox... off to write! :) (Must work... LOL)
Sam
I meant for the interviewer
I meant for the interviewer to get over it! I think Michael Caine was pretty far over it and was getting frustrated by the same old questions. He's always very open and interesting about his roots but maybe he just wanted to talk about what was going on in his life then, not in the 1950's, LOL.
I grew up in an environment where I was supposed to marry a nice man in a suit who would support me, so I never worried all that much about money and earning it. Perhaps for that reason it was never a very important part of the HEA in a book for me, either. One day an avid romance-reading friend told me how she always worries desperately about how the couple will support themselves after the book. Ever since then I make sure to spell out that they are materially well off! It's funny how everyone has a different perspective.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Ah! LOL
It is... interesting comment about your reader! Similar, even though working class, grew up in an environment where we would get married, have babies, work... Lead to big mistake in first marriage. ;) Some of those values really didn't hold when it came to romance -- when I grew up and became a little more enlightened about the world, then I met someone and got it right. ;)
He didn't have a privileged life, my current husband, but he lived in CT and so I like to tease him about being upper crust, the CT image, even though they weren't... LOL
I love Michael Caine.
Sam
LOL about CT. I have a
LOL about CT. I have a friend who grew up in CT and we discuss these issues quite often. She loves to point out that despite her blue collar roots she still wears polo shirts and argyle socks. Its a CT thang....
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Your books looks very nice :)
Hi,
I have to agree with you, wealthy heroes are always nice, especially when you are reading a Silhouette Desire book! THough it is really nice when the hero is not too arrogant and helps the community, has a soft side, does some charity work.
I have won your 2 books... and I am anxious to receive them :)
Hey Nathalie! Great to see
Hey Nathalie! Great to see you again!! The books are winging their way to you. I mailed them on Saturday via priority mail so you should get them soon. Our post office is frighteningly incompetent so I'll keep my fingers crossed....
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Thanx
Thanx Jen,
I am totally anxious to read your books :)
Classified
Very interesting discussion! I don't believe there is such a thing as a classfree society-as long as humans are involved there will be competition and greed and envy. While some may feel that a certain level of income or achievement may be more or less tolerant, unless you are in that social strata I don't think you can see the subleties that are created by each class to distinguish themselves from those around them. Behavior plays a big part- when everyone in your circle is basically equal in education and income we manage to create other criteria to judge those around us with! Do they work enough?- how do they spend their money?- how are their children dressed, disciplined, how many activites and sports are they involved in? And it goes on and on!
Can you tell the subject fascinates me? LOL I love books that address this and have read many 'other world' types that pose these problems. Also some historical romance- one that I can think of is "One Night For Love" by Mary Balogh. Not only does she have her H/H from different social levels, but she deals in a much more honest manner with the problems inherent in that situation than in any other romance I have read. A few times while reading I was actualy embarressed and uncomfortable for the people in the story. I definitely recommend it!
Didn't mean for this to be so long and I will be sure to look for your book, Jennifer!
Dameholly, I think you're so
Dameholly, I think you're so right that it's just in human nature to find ways to define ourselves as different (and probably better!) than those around us. Even when the differences are so obscure that no one outside the group could see them. I once read somewhere that the most intense hostility is reserved for the social class immediately above and immediately below one's own. I imagine this is because they are the most threatening to one's own identity and sense of self.
It is a fascinating subject! I'll have to check out One Night for Love.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Interesting! We were talking
Interesting! We were talking about this, to an extent, a couple of weeks ago at my WRW meeting. It was a panel on historicals and someone asked whether you could ever have a regency romance where a titled hero meets and marries a maid and whether it would work. After all, even in P&P, the Bennetts were still part of the landed society, even if they were one or two rungs down on the ladder from the Darcys.
The general consensus was that it wouldn't, simply because of the times and the setting (England), but you could definitely have that in a contemporary set in the US. That's not to say that you couldn't write a Regency with that as the premise, but the couple would have to end up living HEA in their country house and not go out into society.
Anyway, in the YA time travel I'm working on, I have a very upper-class WASPy hero and a middle-class heroine who both attend the same exclusive private university. She's definitely not poor and not disadvantaged, but she sort of resents him in the beginning, because she's worked for the things she has (including getting into the school) whereas he's always been handed everything on a silver platter and is a world class slacker who seems hellbent on doing the exact opposite of what his father, the Senator, wants. She thinks he treats everything with a sense of entitlement, and it pisses her off. Of course, things aren't what they seem, and he's actually hardworking...they just want different things out of life (she wants power and money and he wants to be a teacher in an inner city school working with disadvantaged kids, but she doesn't realize it).
I grew up in a sort of snotty upper-middle class town, but I wasn't upper-middle-class. More like middle-middle class, or maybe even lower-middle-class (but probably MMC). Both my parents had advantaged degrees beyond undergrad (my mom has a master's and my dad has an MBA, a master's and a PhD), but wealth doesn't always follow from an overabundance of degrees, especially when you go into teaching, which they both did (my dad was a college professor for a while...then he worked in the private sector as an economist, but he lost his job in the early 90s downsizing and eventually worked for the federal government). I eventually went to an elite private university, but had a lot of financial aid. There were a lot of kids at my college who came from uber upper class priviledged backgrounds and sometimes I was jealous, but it just wasn't me. As for the rich not knowing about the poor because they just don't interact with them, so true. There were sororities at my school who would call their local alumnae reps nearest to where you grew up and ask what your father (because god forbid the mother work) did for a living before they would accept you. I kid you not.
My parents had really instilled a sense of work and not getting everything I wanted, and I think that it is still with me today. Hubster and I make oodles more than his or my parents ever did, yet we still live like grad students because that's just what we're used to.
I think you're right about
I think you're right about the regency couple having to live a life of "seclusion" if they followed their hearts. Definitely wouldn't be invited to the right parties! Of course what most likely would have happened is that he'd compromise her "maidenhood" and then set her up as a mistress somewhere. Or the family would pay her to disappear. Lady Chatterley's Lover (DH Lawrence) and Maurice (EM Forster) have a similar situation taking place in the 1930's (which was about as enlightened as the regency, but I suppose authors were starting to question old assumptions). Both have an upper class, connected person getting into a relationship with someone from a totally unacceptable social class, and the happy ending (such as it is--implied rather than actual) in each book involves them planning to go live in the middle of nowhere, away from the disapproving gaze of society. Of course Maurice has a gay component as well...
In some circles there's an element of this still alive today. A couple who is "breaking the rules" will never be accepted into the group of the other couple. Like you said about the sororities, some people just can't stand the idea of anyone breaking into their precious clique.
But the beauty of romance is that we get to make it a HEA anyway :-))))
Your story sounds fun!
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Thanks Jen! I'm having fun
Thanks Jen! I'm having fun writing it. I forgot to mention that going back in time is what puts them on equal footing...neither one of them have money! The euros and credits cards in the wallets are completely useless in 1899, when the franc was the currency of the day. So by being taken out of their comfort zones, they come to have to rely on either other and are able to see each other differently.
Hi Jennifer!
I do like these social status conflict in a romance. I enjoy seeing people realize that while they're lucky to have what they do, what you have is not everything.
Maureen, I think you've hit
Maureen, I think you've hit on part of the appeal of romances (and soap operas, etc) with very wealthy characters--it's fun to see that underneath the glittery trappings they're just human and need love and affection and all that stuff no amount of money can buy.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
I agree!
I have to agree with both Maureen and Jen. It is wonderful watching someone fall for who the other person is as a human being rather than what they are.
Very interesting!
Hi, Jennifer! Gorgeous cover and a very interesting topic! I'm finding everyone's thoughts pretty good reading! As others have said, I think some class differences are alive and well, but most of us don't interact regularly with the extremes of the spectrum. Stories are one way we can see how the other side lives, so to speak. Depending on how it's handled, it can make for a truly wonderful happily-ever after. The one I read most recently is Julia Quinn's An Offer from a Gentleman, where the heroine is the unacknowledged illegitimate daughter of an earl and is painfully aware of her place in society.
I'll look for that book!
It sounds interesting. I love stories where people don't quite fit in anywhere. Makes for interesting characterization!
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Social status
I think that you have a point about social classes in America. Since I never attened private school or come from wealth I can guess. I do think the middle class in the US is shrinking
Shrinking middle class?
The middle class is certainly changing--having to adapt to new technologies. I guess whether it's growing or shrinking depends on how you define it. IMHO, Americans overall have a very high standard of living compared with much of the rest of the world.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
classes
Looking things from Finland, I have to agree about American society. That's not to say that Finland would be completely classless society, but here you are far more likely to go to the same schools with the more privilaged kids, since there are no exclusive private schools the way they have in America.
Finland
Interesting! It seems like the Scandinavian countries have put a lot of effort into making society more equal.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
I don't find it surprising
I don't find it surprising that class plays a big role in people's perceptions of others.
First, we're still apes. Apes organize themselves into troops, some apes become alphas, the rest do what the alphas direct them to do. And conspire to become alphas themselves.
Alphas also have major advantages when it comes to mating. They're 'more attractive'. Plus they eat better and get the best of things. So being mated to an alpha has advantages as well.
Furthermore, humans need an identity. Most often this identity is drawn from their socio-economic, especially here in the West where economics is so important. This pretty much entails thinking less of other classes as thinking highly of other classes is often regarded as an attack on your own class and your identity.
That said, I very much like stories where the people in them come from different classes. I like the egalitarian message of it: that we're all people, that we're all important, that we're all capable of loving and being loved.
Leader of the Pack
Rob, I think about that all the time when pondering alpha males and what makes them attractive (hey, it's my job...). It's fascinating that such primal modes of organization still operate much as they did in the stone age (and way way way before it!) I guess human nature is slow to change.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Hello!
Your book sounds wonderful. I will definitely be on the look out for it!
As for the social class conflict in books, I like reading all types of stories and all types of conflicts so it doesn't bother me. My favorite example of people from two different classes falling for each other is actually a film. One of my favorite films of all time is "Sabrina" where social status is an issue between the leads. I loved both the new and old versions of this movie where the wealthy man falls for the chauffeur's (sp?) daughter.
Sabrina
Oooh, I haven't seen that in a long time! I'll have to check it out again.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Great book cover!
Great book cover!
Cover
Thanks Estella, I love it too. Naldo looks so much like Naldo in my mind it's almost scary.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
I think that is one of the
I think that is one of the reasons historicals appeal to me. The difference in social status is expected but it wouldn't work today in a contemporary book. I enjoy going back to a time that is different from my own and you really have to put your mind into a different mindset for it to work, which is exactly what a good author accomplishes.
Historicals
Hi Catslady, my books actually are contemporaries! I love to put historical type plots in contemporary settings. Are society has changed a lot in some ways, but other elements still exist much as they did in the 18th century--just depends on the mindset of the person involved.
Jen
http://www.jenlewis.com
Just thinking about this.
I have been thinking about this a lot since I just finished writing a Presents that I hope to submit soon and of course this is a core issue at the heart of almost every Presents but in this case he isn't as interested in his wealth and consequence as she is in that she feels uncomfortable with the differences between them while he's indifferent about it.
But in reality I think it's pretty much about the individual as far as who cares and who doesn't. I know people have theorized that only the rich see the differences between the classes or only the poor do but the truth is some poor people care, some rich people do. Class is honestly one of those things that I tend to forget until people do something to bring it up.
I was raised as a trailer park princess and I married a guy who was raised in upper class suburbia and it rarely even comes up but when it does I'm always a little surprised with how little difference it makes in the long run. But as a product of such a poor upbringing I think they the one thing I have seen is that the poor have less advantages and opportunities but there's nothing that actually indicates that they are any happier or unhappier than the ultra wealthy. Any extreme tends to be unhealthy, I think.
Best of luck with your
Best of luck with your presents! I think that in real life usually it's where people want to be in life (together!) that makes a partnership successful, not where they came from. I love stories that show people from different backgrounds can live HEA (as you are doing, LOL!)
http://www.jenlewis.com
Class
I think it's very normal to see this class consciousness in every society, reflected in writing of all types, and especially in paranormals where you have different species and such. Class or status is simply a reflection of the status hierarchy that goes down through the species and all through nature. Every tribe or herd or group has its alphas and its omegas, and each is very conscious of it. Where some groups expect the alphas to fight for position, we humans either work for it or are born into it. I also think it's normal for working class or middle class or whatever you choose to call it, to have conflicted feelings for those who have it, regardless of how they got it. We have less respect for someone who was born into it than for someone who wasn't - we figure they did nothing to deserve it or earn our respect. By the same token, we pick at those who did earn it because we figure they must have stepped on one of us to get there, or we're jealous. So I would actually be very frustrated with a story that didn't reflect this part of human nature somewhere - it wouldn't be true to life.