The Power of Compelling Writing

Dee Tenorio's picture

I love writing craft. It's like looking at a prism. Sure, the rainbow is awesome, but the really fascinating thing is all the angles that can be used to change white light into multiple shades of color. Each angle reveals something different, something true. In writing, those angles are perspective and depending on who's telling the story, a lot can change. A dull, trite tale becomes gritty, fantastic, epic or tragic. It all hangs on the writer's ability to compel you to care.

Take favorite tv shows, for example. My husband and I have been fans of Chuck, Heroes and Lost for a while. All three shows have gone through some ups and downs. For those that aren't familiar, "Chuck" is a show about a regular guy, working at a regular job in his regular life, who regrets the turn that took him from "special" to "common", when all of a sudden, something extraordinary turns him into a human computer server. Now he's working undercover for the CIA/NSA and all he wants is to get that regular life back. "Heroes" is a show about regular people who discover they have special abilities and powers and the trials those powers put them through. It centers primarily on a family that can't quite decide if they're good guys, bad guys...or even a family. Finally, "Lost" is a show about a plane that crashes on an island where nothing is what it seems and everything has a purpose. Or does it?

Chuck is a funny spy show, at it's most basic description. Week in and week out, they have a new mission where the vastly unprepared Chuck faces a new challenge and an unlikely chance of survival. He's also in love with the CIA agent who is protecting him, though he's got zero chance of ever being with her. Should be formulaic, right? Where's the compulsion? Well, it's all in the writing. Chuck's humor and simple approach to spy work juxtaposed against the every day drama of his friends in the "Buy More" store where he works, his bumbling in life and death situations and his determination to win the girl against all odds bring you back week after week. Throw in the ever-shifting loyalties of the Military--to them he's an asset that must either be protected or destroyed before he can be used against them--and it's impossible not to root for the guy. And just when you think you've got Chuck down and can miss a week...that's when they change something and send the show spinning in a whole new direction.

Heroes, on the other hand, takes a much darker approach. What would happen if regular people suddenly had extraordinary abilities? What makes a character a "Good Guy" or a "Bad Guy"? Is it what you can do...or what you do with your abilities? Do some abilities make you what you are, no matter who you are on the inside? Deep philosophical questions often asked as regular people come out of their shells to "save the world". Much of Heroes is about fate, the greater good and just about all of it is about perspective. The show took a deep stumble around the time of the writer's strike and had a very short second season. Episodes began to make very little sense or were almost painfully...well, lame. There were long passages that didn't made you cringe, to be honest. New characters that were flat. Old characters doing inexplicable things to bring those new characters in. Good characters being killed off unnecessary ways while others were just dropped off the face of the planet (or time--one poor girl got dumped in a future that no longer exists!). I was this close to quitting and not looking back. Except... Despite being able to actually see the writing, feel the taut line and abruptness of the shortcuts taken to try to give the plot stability again, the characters were still compelling. The time traveler whose innocence is slowly becoming eroded by his trials for the greater good. The young man who's empathy for others was his greatest strength, but has also proven a personal weakness. The villain who has slowly been unraveled as a desperate father, doing what's needed to protect his family. Even the serial killer who has lost his struggle for his humanity. I just had to know what would happen next for these people. So while the plots have gone places sci-fi really didn't need to boldly go, I keep coming back to watch compelling characters evolve. And you know what, I've been rewarded with some real gems of episodes, watching the writer's put right what weak writing made bad. Reconstruction takes time, but because of their ability to lure me in with interesting people, I'm willing to give them a second chance.

Last but not least, Lost. There've been about a million articles done on this series. What is this island that these people have landed on? Why doesn't anything make sense? What is a polar bear doing there? And what, for the love of God, do those numbers mean? Well... I can't really give you those answers too quickly. The writers spent three years showing us that 100 days on a beach isn't really your dream vacation. They created questions and left you sailing in the wind. They gave you forty characters to learn about, filling you in on their backstories little by little by little. Oh, and then they killed people off willy nilly, just to see if you were paying attention. There's no heroes, not really. Everyone has a history they're not proud of. Dynamics change on a weekly basis. Shoot, romantic connections change and week by week, everything I thought I knew becomes something I can't believe. So why do I keep watching? Because every week, I'm surprised. I'm drawn in. I'm shown that nothing is black and white and that a good mystery takes time, takes mistakes and takes details. And as the show moves inexorably towards it's finale--next year is the last year, I believe--answers are found everywhere. As I greedily sort out the mysteries, I'm unearthing new, shinier questions and I'm flat out addicted to wanting to know.

There's huge lessons to be learned by watching tv, as a writer. It's a master class of creating compelling experiences, characters and perspectives. Whether every show is one we love or hate, the truth is, it's a rough world out there for a tv show. If they don't win you over and win you big, they end, whether the story is resolved or not. The hooks are sharp, the competition fierce and the drama big. Writers who pay attention to the lessons they're giving can find new ways to tell good stories and maybe compel a few folks to their side of the entertainment world, doncha think?

Reader or writer, what's your favorite show? What compels you to tune in, week after week?

Tuning in

to Castle - since it's about a writer (though oddly enough you rarely see him writing) has good chemistry between the guy and the girl.
Burn Notice - the suspense, action, will Fee and Michael find their HEA - you know they love each other but all those things get in the way, great dialogue.
CSI - interesting to see how they involve the new character. There doesn't seem to be much interaction between them all like it used to be though. Wendy and Hodges story is quite cute - some oddball chemistry.
Soaps can be good for over-the-top drama.

Have they been developing Wendy and Hodges more?

I love the episodes that worked on that. I tried watching a few after Grissom, but I wasn't into it. So I stopped. I might go back for a Hodges/Wendy romance, lol.

I keep missing Castle, very unhappy with myself. Must wait for reruns.

Oh, Burn Notice! You picked up Sam's favorite hero. I do love that show, too, but couldn't keep up. Must catch up on a marathon.

Oh, fun!

Let's see...my all-time favorite is The Wire, which is sadly done and gone. I'm flirting with Fringe right now...not sure it's worth an hour of my week, but it is Joshua Jackson, and the female lead is strangely compelling.

I know what you mean...

I never got to see The Wire, but I heard a lot about it. I tried Fringe, the two or three I saw were cool, but like you, I wasn't sure I wanted to devote to it. And yeah, I can't tell what it is about that chick that makes her watchable, but it's there. Even when she's staring at a panel of lights, lol.

You'll like this...

I just got this link from Televisionary, and I think you'd like it -- I found it interesting. He says, "Here's how great scripts look and read":

http://www.kottke.org/09/04/the-wire-bible

Sam (back with more soon)

Oh, hell...

Okay, I'm not done with my writing yet, but I can't hold off any longer. I do watch and learn a lot from TV, always have -- conflict and drama from BUFFY, that it's okay to be a little corny or "out there" from The Pretender, or how to have a truly complex heroine, from THE CLOSER and VERONICA MARS.

FWIW, I think HEROES has gone to hell, and I can't imagine watching another season.

Two shows which have had amazing revitalization this season are LOST and DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES -- you don't hear too much about DH, but I think they really came up with one of their best seasons yet. And the writing really has been fantastic, layered, interesting. Hysterical in many cases. I did tune out of the Edie retrospective, because this is two dead-people retros for one season, and they're predictable. Honestly, their plotting has been flawless and frankly, I never thought they could pull off the "five years later" thing.

CHUCK, I think, is terrific in its relationships, a great blend of action and character, though they get carried away with subplot. This past week's episode was near perfect, the week before, I found the secondaries and subplot annoying.

However, the primo action/comedy is BURN NOTICE -- the first season is still unmatched, but they are unparalleled for balancing character development with action while carrying out a very focused premise. Unlike LOST or HEROES, which goes all over the place with dozens of characters, BURN NOTICE is extremely focused, and a great lesson in how to develop a fascinating main character, AND fascinating secondaries. Though I am not a huge Fiona fan. She's okay. He could do better. But the show has everything in other ways -- action, comedy, romance, intrigue, and family drama.

For mystery, I do love CASTLE and BONES, though I hope CASTLE starts spending more time developing their main character, who at this point is not nearly as interesting as the detective he works with. They are letting their secondary carry the story, while he just sits around being quippy. Also, they keep stealing CHUCK's "stay in the car" schtick. But the mysteries are good, and as an aspiring mystery writer, I pay close attention to plot. Mostly, they have held up.

BONES is always a treat in that area, the plots are always good, though they are in danger of turning their wonderful characters into caricatures -- the characters *used* to be more complex and interesting, but now they are all being whittled down to simplifications -- Bones is SCIENTIST -- becoming like Mr. Spock with her ridiculous lack of emotional communication (which was NOT true of her earlier in the series) and she's an ANTHROPOLOGIST for crying out loud. She studies human society and history, so for her to be so unflinchingly clueless this many seasons in isn't playing right. Seeley is MACHO, Angela is SEX MANIAC, Hodge is WEIRDO and Cam is BOSS. I think the real problem is they have lost a sense of their tone -- sometimes they are dark and serious, other times almost stupidly silly. They need more balance. However, I like the show and the plots are usually good.

LIE TO ME is my new fascination. It's new, and I can't say how it's affecting anything in my writing yet, but it definitely catches my attention and makes me think. I like him and his psychologist partner a lot -- I think his relationship with his co-workers and his daughter is really interesting (moreso than Castle's, unfortunately), and the way the show borders fact and fiction is wonderful.

So, this is the list for the moment... back to writing...

TV shows are great...

For teaching writers a lot about how to show instead of tell, too, IMO. I watch Lost obsessively, LOL. I like LIFE, because I like the quirky character of Crews. I love HOUSE, again, another quirky character with layers that every once in a while get exposed and you see why he is the way he is.

That I think is what draws me to a show, or a movie. It's characters who aren't perfect, who have layers that make them flawed. My favorite character on ER was Doug Ross, especially when his life was self destructing, and then he saved that little boy and was a huge hero, but couldn't handle the accolades.

I just got back from a few days at a conference where the focus was crime--and we saw a lot of flawed people in the research there ;-) but it was cool to hear the cops talk about the the judgment calls they make every day.

Shirley

New York Times and USA Today Bestselling Author
In Stores Now: DOORSTEP DADDY
www.shirleyjump.com
THE WELL, coming in September
www.ajwhitten.com

That sounds amazing...

I need to go to crime conferences -- can you tell me the next time you go? :)

I think you're absolutely right about the show don't tell, which is why I find scriptwriting books to be very handy writing craft books. More so sometimes than novel writing books. Except that in scriptwriting and TV, there's so much they can skip that we can't. They can convey so much in image and visuals that we have to describe, there's no way around it, and that's where the novelist's challenge is, I think. I was watching Castle the other night, and saw him sharing a meaningful look with the heroine detective, and I remember thinking "if I were writing that, I'd have to decide which POV, what they were thinking, etc and describe it" which is where we fall into traps.

But I do think that aiming to show more than tell helps avoid the traps, too... Shirley, you aren't at RWA this year? Will you be doing the New England Crime Bake? I need to pick your brain on the showing/telling bit... ;)

Sam

Yep

We love Chuck, too, and DH watches Lost and Heroes (they're either a little too scary or too confusing for me). Sam, I haven't watched Desperate Housewives in a while--sounds like I ought to pick it back up! I'm a big fan of shows that can weave in the funny with the rest of it!

I really think...

Heroes took massive shortcuts in season 2, made huge mistakes that are being erased essentially, and irrevocably. Things are being put right, but it's taking time to wipe out all that crap. The writing is improving, but I'm willing to give them time to fix it. It's a lesson in the perils of ego and self-indulgency. If they dive again, though, I'm gone.

Hubby and I are saving Chuck for when we're home together. I'm still happy with all the Quantam Leap references from that other episode. :)

Dee

Also...

HAPPY BIRTHDAY! You're the best, Dee!

Sam

Ditto from me!

Happy birthday, Dee!!!!!!

Shirley

New York Times and USA Today Bestselling Author
In Stores Now: DOORSTEP DADDY
www.shirleyjump.com
THE WELL, coming in September
www.ajwhitten.com

Castle....

I love Castle because of the relationship between the writer and the cop. The dynamic is excellent and the lines are great.

Bones, Again the relationship between the two main characters and the scientific content. I love science and mystery. I love the Hardy boys, btw, not only for the view but the mystery, lol.

I also like to watch "Tell Me Lies". I'm interested in the human condition and the clues this expert identifies are very subtle to the person that hasn't studied people. The study of people is interesting to me.

Comedy: Everyone Loves Raymond, Full House, Cosby Show, Tool Time, and the like. The lines are witty and most of us can relate to them. That makes them funny.

The Ghost Whisperer-love the otherworldly connection. Sometimes scarey but everything works out in the end.

I tend to like What Not to Wear and Clean House. I like those because most of it is unscripted and the reactions of people to real situations is something to put in the data bank for later use.

Thanks for making me think. :D