Give it a name...

Sarah Mayberry's picture

Hello. I am officially feeling frivolous after a day spent bargain hunting in the post Christmas sales. Hence, my post topic: euphemisms in romance novels. Now, all the writers on this forum write for Blaze, so we all write pretty explicit sex scenes in our books and we aren't forced by the constraints of the line to use euphemisms to paint a picture. And I'm going to assume that most of our readers don't mind reading explicit sex scenes since you're kind of here because of the books... So... I was thinking today about what my favourite and least favourite words/phrases were when it came to sex in books.

Mostly, what I realised is that I like things to be called what they are, without too much dressing up. For example, erection is good.(This post works on soooo many levels...) Penis is fine, although I have read another writer saying she thinks penis is just unsexy as a word. But I'll take penis over manhood any day, thanks. Especially a throbbing manhood. And forget about "his sword" or any other analogy that involves tools, kitchen appliances or sporting equipment. Scrotum, I have to say, makes me laugh every time, but I am a deeply immature person, I can admit that, and I would much prefer it to some fancied-up round-about way of saying it like "love sac". Then there are the girl bits. Yes, I just used a euphemism, but here's my one rider on this subject - if a euphemism is used tongue in cheek or humourously, it's definitely allowed.

So, girl bits. Breasts are good. Nipples, ditto. Mounds and peaks... well, I use them both sometimes in my writing, I think. But globes are out. Pillows...only on the bed, with bedlinen on them, please. Hot tunnel doesn't do much for me either, but maybe that's because I'm claustrophic and it's pushing forty degrees here in Melbourne. And here's my one big ick for sex scenes - any mention of internal bits just kind of freaks me out. I don't want to think about wombs or cervixes when I'm reading about hot sex. Is this just me? I suspect this is probably a deeply personal taste thing, but if you care to share your preferences and the things that make you wince when reading sex scenes, I'm sure all us romance writers would love to hear it. It's one of the big things I always ask my friends who read my first drafts and my editor - please, please, please always tell me when a word or phrase throws you out of the moment. Over to you...
Until next time
Sarah

Sex Descriptions

Sarah, Sometimes the description of personal parts gives me a chuckle. I can deal with reading any descriptions if the story is good.The only thing that really irks me, is when an author describes a man as having flaring nostrils when having sex.I have yet to see a mans nostrils flare when having sex. It makes me think of a fire breathing dragon, instead of a sexy man in the heat of passion. Any writer who is good , wouldn't use really stupid expressions to describe private parts. I have read several of your books and, I can assure you, you don't use expressions for private parts that are stupid or offensive. As long as you don't use, sword or quivering member to describe a mans penis or, clouds of joy or soft fluffy puffs to describe a womans breasts, I think you'll continue to have me as a devoted reader. Oh yes, don't forget the flaring nostrils too. I don't know if this was much help but, I think if your story is a good one, then it really doesn't matter how you describe private parts. The story should be what matters the most. So far, your stories have all been very good and, I'll continue to read them as long as you continue to write them. Mads:)

thanks

Thanks Mads. You're a writer's best friend.

LOL

Sarah and Mads, you both have my chuckling, which is welcome, since it's been a tough week. ;)

I'm with you both -- I actually don't mind penis at all as a word, in fact, for some reason, find it quite sexy, maybe because it was so unused for so long. Ditto on erection, cock, hard-on, wood, woody, shaft, and in some cases, rod -- that one's iffy. Some can start coming across as cheapo porn words, depending on context, and while we write hot sex scenes, we're still writing romance, so context really is everything. "Dick" I only use as a perjorative, as in "he was really being a dick, but he couldn't help it, he was pissed." etc

Women are tougher -- many words tend to come off derogatory, so sticking to the absolutely phsyical is best, or going to for poetic. Not crazy about the "c" or "p" words here, just find them a stretch for romance, and yeah, also put off by things that smack more of motherhood than sexuality. Though have a personal distate for "mons" as well. That one gets an eye roll every time. I don't know why. And unfortunately, the writers who use that one tend to use it a lot, I've found, leading me to a reading experience that's much like the scene of Homer Simpson stepping on rakes, repeatedly being hit in the face, "doh!" .... "doh!"...."doh!" LOL

However, enjoy seeing "fuck" in particular used in sexy romantic ways, as opposed to always in anger. Can be a very sexy word, though again, has the rake in the face effect if overused, which it has been in some books recently... It can suggest lack of imagination after a while....

Frankly, I prefer writing that goes for the aesthetic in sex which is not really euphemistic, but just refocuses the experience a little differently -- (Lori Wilde is brilliant at this, and it's something I've tried to model on) -- describing scents, tastes, and textures, rather than parts, though parts must be dealt with at some point.

One of the most interesting things my editor has brought up in the past is the different words that male or female characters would use -- using a word that is right and appropriate for the scene and the character. That's the key.

This all highly dependent on the type of character, of course -- but that most men will think "ass" while most women will think something like "butt" which seems right to me, and so the words should really, in the end, reflect the character. It was something I had to think about a lot in Untouched, as Risa was not only a virgin physically, but she hadn't ever thought about men in that way -- her view was completely out of the contemporary mindset, she had no experience socially or physically. It was kind of fun, really, to have her looking at Daniel's backside (another really female referent, I think) and trying to see the fascination that other women had, LOL.

Sam

Interesting

I think that it must be very challenging to always come up with descriptive terms for those (ahem!) areas. I mean there are only so many adjectives that can be applied. You guys do an amazing job! Last night I bought and read Untouched. WOW! Great Book. I cannot believe how great it was. Debbie

officially challenged

Debbie, I am often challenged by sex scenes. Sometimes they flow, sometimes it's like writing a manual for martial arts. And yeah, the trusty barrel'o'adjectives does run dry sometimes...

As for Untouched - I am gagging for this book. I read the excerpt and premise on-line at e-harlequin and thought it was a great idea and a great start from Sam. I will be haunting the bookshelves when it comes out down here in Australia - usually the delay is only a month or two, and I quite like knowing there is a great book coming up...Althought Lori's post has got me thinking about e-books and the instant gratification factor is a powerful lure...

Talking about me?

Hey Sarah--I think you might have been talking about me as the one who said I disliked the word penis when I blogged about this subject a few months ago. Eeek...I still give it a big thumbs down. It just seems like a little-boys-snickering kind of word to me. Lucky thing there's no right and no wrong in this business! The only job where you can let your own likes and dislikes come through and not be afraid you've got it wrong. Cute blogsite!

not you, but...

Leslie, it wasn't your blog I read it on, believe it or not. It was a quote from an article by Deb Stover for beginner romance writers (http://www.debstover.com/purple.html)- I can't even remember how I stumbled across it - and the penis comment was from Anne Stuart. But it just goes to show, penis is clearly a border-line word. I will say, it's not my favourite, either - I just prefer it to some of the euphemisms and alternatives out there. Thanks for dropping by!
S

This is really interesting,

This is really interesting, most people have very definitive ideas of what they find offensive, attractive or plain hilarious. I personally like the word penis, it leaves no space for ambiguity. Hardness makes me smile, so does manhood, throbbing or pulsating or thrusting or whatever! Ugh! With women I would suppose it would be easier to write perhaps. Just the word tits puts me off, and this wasn't in a romance but in some random book and its just the WORST description of breasts i have EVER read - 'those great feminine anatomical chattels'...are u kidding me?!

seriously?

You actually read that in a book? Ugh.

I also dislike the word tits. Might as well go with udders, LOL.

Sam

And then again...

There are also the words so popular with the boys when I was at high school. Brace yourselves: fun bags for breasts. Party hole for you-know-where. Charming? Oh yes! By comparison, tits seems poetic. As for chattels of whatever... insane!

Party hole??? I'm

Party hole??? I'm speechless!!! Good lord. Fun bags? Tits? Udders? Even though I don't know what to say, I can at least be thankful for a great laugh! I had heard of it referred to as a "Snatch." Could someone please enlighten me? Dawn

LOL

oh yes, that -- maybe because they want to "get some" as in grab or snatch some?

beats me. LOL I would think anyone really using that word probably isn't going to get much... ;>

sam